Rather it should be their efficiency minimised. When aircraft control surfaces are damage, their deflection is minimised Very annoying in planes like the 109 G-6, and it can become over 60% opaque.Ī screenshot inside a Bf 109 G-10 with movie settings on my brother's computer with the head leaned up right against the glass Reflections on windows become literally, "buzzingly annoying" when the head is close to the window, and it becomes transparent. Bottom half of the tail does not deflect with the tail. Seafire tail hooks (still) do not extend correctly. External model shows the bumps due to the MG131 machineguns Tail in the Cockpit View in the He 162 is staticįockewulf A-8 has a flat nose. Yes im srs we laughed ourselves off when HUD was disabled for a few days in air simulator battles Lean the head to the side first to see it.īf 109 G6-14 series do not have a fuel guage LaGG aircraft series has a void spot in the rear on the side of the seat as viewed from cockpit, external model is different Props thin and long, nose is different etc. Stuka "D" series cockpit models do not have their aircraft fuselage match the external model Decals also are seen clearly inside the fuselage and non-damage cases such as inside the jet exhaust of the P80 when mirrored. On Some aircraft the fuselage skin is visable from the inside (i.e. Probably due to the way textures are mapped onto the models.
Some aircraft have stretched/missing texture inside where the ailerons sit. The "inside" part of where control surfaces sit on some vehicles do not look correct. Focke-Wulf FW190 Cockpit models has a void gap between the edge of the frame (lean to the side) and the external model
0 kommentar(er)
